Hybrid solar irrigation system beside cultivated fields in Rangpur

SAF Bangladesh | Field evidence | June 2026

Farming Smart
Model Villages

The infrastructure is visible. The operating discipline is the real innovation.

Funded by Standard Chartered Bank Implemented by Sustainable Agriculture Foundation Bangladesh Follow-up evidence through March 2026
Hybrid solar irrigation | SAF FSMV project documentation
2registered Centers of ExcellenceInstitutional anchors
3,500reported service reachAdministrative count
BDT 2.86mlocal co-investmentProvisional ledger
women producersSupported + reported replicators

The central finding

The pilot has generated enough evidence to justify a structured validation phase.

The model is in place. The next investment should prove durability.

The pilot connected local institutions, market services, shared assets and climate-risk tools. A 24-month validation phase should now test revenue, demand, governance and household outcomes.

The operating model

Governance holds the model together. Commerce keeps it useful.

The Center of Excellence provides local oversight. The Farmers' Hub turns that structure into services farmers can use across seasons.

CoERegistration, asset oversight, digital access and public-agency coordination.
Farmers' HubInputs, aggregation, equipment rental, advisory and transaction records.
Shared systemAssets, market access and transaction records designed to reinforce each other.

The next test: whether fees, governance and demand hold after subsidy ends.

Farmers' Hub and nursery established through the FSMV project
Farmers' Hub and nursery | SAF project documentation

Four transferable practices

What other programmes can use now.

The transferable value lies in four operating decisions that other programmes can test, adapt and measure.

FSMV Farmers' Hub and nursery as a local institutional anchor
Institutional anchor | SAF project documentation
01 Institution

Give one local institution clear responsibility.

A registered entity can coordinate shared assets, relationships and records. Registration creates the basis for accountability; ongoing governance shows whether it lasts.

2 registered CoEsLocal governance and shared-service anchors

02 | Enterprise

Build the buyer into the intervention.

The producer network became more useful when production connected to aggregation and a committed off-taker. Sales volume grew while the aggregator's margin remained broadly stable.

Woman vermicompost producer holding finished compost
Producer | SAF project documentation
Vermicompost entrepreneur beside a delivery vehicle and packaged product
Product and route to market | SAF project documentation

03 | Co-investment

0.73 : 1

Local contribution to SCB asset funding

Use co-investment to test value and ownership.

The BDT 2.86 million contribution signals willingness to invest. Phase II must show whether user fees, maintenance reserves and ownership rules protect the assets.

BDT 6.785mTotal reported asset value
BDT 2.86mCommunity contribution
Farmer operating a mini-tiller during an FSMV field demonstration
Mini-tiller demonstration | SAF completion report
04Validation

The learning case

The constraint is part of the result.

One returned-migrant enterprise added production chambers, but output and demand did not keep pace. That finding points Phase II towards capacity use, working capital and repeat urban demand.

2 → 5Production chambers
6 tAnnualized output
BDT 25.2kEstimated annual net profit
IntermittentUrban retail operation

The investment case

The model is operating. Phase II must prove the economics.

What the pilot has demonstrated

04 promising signals
  • 2 entities
    Institutional formationTwo registered local entities now coordinate shared services and assets.
  • BDT 96k → 360k
    Aggregation-led enterpriseAggregator monthly sales increased, based on unaudited enterprise accounts.
  • BDT 2.86m
    Community co-investmentCommunities contributed towards productive assets, according to the provisional ledger.
  • 300 policies
    Insurance administrationProject records report completed enrolment, premium collection and policy activation.

What Phase II should validate

04 investment tests
  • 4 quarters
    Asset sustainabilityTest whether user fees cover routine O&M, downtime, repairs and reserves.
  • 1 lending test
    Financial inclusionTest whether a regulated lender will use project transaction records in underwriting and repayment.
  • Triggered season
    Insurance performanceAssess claims, payout speed and farm-level basis risk when the index triggers.
  • Longitudinal
    Household outcomesMeasure income, migration and climate-loss outcomes over time.
Delivery issue to close | Soil-health cards200 distributed400 outstanding

Phase II | 24 months

Set the evidence gates before scaling.

A 24-month validation phase should test six conditions. Further investment in replication should follow only when all six are met.

Starting pointPromising signals
Decision ruleAll six passed
01

Asset sustainability

Record four quarters of utilization and fee collection; cover routine O&M and establish a reserve policy.

02

Enterprise viability

Demonstrate positive net income for four consecutive reporting quarters.

03

Financial inclusion

Complete a regulated test of ledger-based underwriting and repayment.

04

Insurance performance

Compare index triggers with observed farm-level losses and document claims performance.

05

Institutional governance

Audit accounts; document asset ownership, fee schedules and grievance handling.

06

Data protection

Secure farmer consent and define data ownership, access controls and sharing limits.

Replication follows evidence, not installation.

FSMV farmers and project partners during a learning and exposure visit

The decision

Retain the model. Run the validation. Replicate on evidence.

The next step is a 24-month validation phase that audits the economics, tests underwriting and measures outcomes.

01 | Retain

The operating model

Local governance. Market-facing services. Co-investment.

02 | Validate

24 months of proof

Audit economics. Test underwriting. Measure outcomes.

03 | Replicate

Only after six gates

Expand with a documented, repeatable model.

Download the full paper PDF | 14 pages | June 2026